mOS of 21.4 MONTHS (95% CI: 18.9, 26.1) with BAVENCIO + BSC vs 14.3 MONTHS (95% CI: 12.9, 17.9) with BSC alone (n=350 in each arm); HR 0.69 (0.56, 0.86); 2-sided P-valuea=0.001
The pre-planned interim analysis was considered the primary analysis since the primary endpoint was met.2,4
Long-term OS results in PD-L1–positive patients1,b (n=358, 51% of patients): HR 0.69 (95% CI: 0.52, 0.90)
PD-L1–negative tumors (exploratory analysis; n=270, 39% of patients): OS HR 0.82 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.09)
An updated OS analysis was conducted when 452 deaths were observed. The follow-up OS analysis was prespecified, but no formal hypothesis testing was performed given that the OS endpoint was met in the initial interim analysis.1,2
aP-value based on stratified log-rank.5
bUsing the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay, PD-L1–positive status was defined as PD-L1 expression in ≥25% of tumor cells or in ≥25% or 100% of tumor-associated immune cells if the percentage of immune cells was >1% or ≤1%, respectively. If none of these criteria were met, PD-L1 status was considered negative.5
LIMITATIONS:
These are exploratory, post hoc analysis of OS data, inclusive of platinum-containing chemotherapy (4-6 cycles), treatment-free interval (4-10 weeks, per trial protocol),
randomized study treatment with BAVENCIO + BSC or BSC alone, and subsequent therapy. This analysis only includes patients who did not progress on first-line platinum-
containing chemotherapy and subsequently enrolled in the JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial. Small patient numbers can be a limitation of subgroup analyses. Safety data are not
available pre-randomization. No conclusions can be drawn from these OS analyses.
LIMITATIONS6:
Figure recreated from Grivas P, et al. Eur Urol. 2023;83(4):320-328.
aFBISI-18 subscales focusing on disease-related symptoms: physical (DRS-P; pain, weight loss, urination, weakness, dizziness, meeting family needs, appetite, erection in males, and sleep), emotional (DRS-E; worrying about disease worsening and sadness), treatment side effects (TSEs; nausea, lack of energy, feeling ill, bowel control, and bother of TSE), and functional well-being (FWB; ability to enjoy life and contentment with QOL). Ranges for each FBlSI-18 score: total, 0-72; DRS-P, 0-36; DRS-E, 0-8; TSE, 0-20; FWB, 0-8. Descriptive statistics were calculated for FBlSI-18 total score and subscales. Estimates of clinically important differences and changes for group comparisons: total, 3-6; DRS-P, 2-3; TSE, 1-2; and DRS-E and FWB, one each. Estimates of significant changes in individual patients: total, 3-9; DRS-P, 2-6; DRS-E, 1-3; TSE, 2-5; and FWB, 2-4.
bNumber of patients who completed the baseline assessment and the assessment at the respective cycle. Data for on-treatment visits that had 10 or more patients in both arms are shown. For the BAVENCIO + BSC and BSC-alone arms, 333 and 330 patients responded to one or more items at baseline, respectively.
1L=first line; BSC=best supportive care; CI=confidence interval; FBlSI-18=Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Bladder Symptom Index-18; HR=hazard ratio; mOS=median overall survival; OS=overall survival; PD-L1=programmed death ligand-1; PRO=patient-reported outcome; QOL=quality of life; SD=standard deviation.
References: 1. Bavencio Prescribing Information. EMD Serono, Inc.; 2024. 2. Powles T, Park SH, Caserta C, et al. Avelumab first-line maintenance for advanced urothelial carcinoma: results from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 Trial after ≥2 years of follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(19):3486-3492. 3. Grivas P, Park SH, Voog E, et al. Avelumab first-line maintenance therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma: comprehensive clinical subgroup analyses from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 Phase 3 Trial. Eur Urol. 2023;84(1):95-108. 4. Data on file. EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA. 5. Powles T, Park SH, Voog E, et al. Avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(13):1218-1230. 6. Grivas P, Kopyltsov E, Su P-J, et al. Patient-reported outcomes from JAVELIN Bladder 100: avelumab first-line maintenance plus best supportive care versus best supportive care alone for advanced urothelial carcinoma. Eur Urol. 2023;83(4):320-328. 7. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Bladder Cancer V.4.2024. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2024. All rights reserved. Accessed May 17, 2024. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way.