4-6 cycles platinum-containing chemotherapy1; 4-10 weeks treatment-free interval2
OS was measured post-randomization (after chemotherapy and treatment-free interval)1
Median duration of follow-up was 19.6 months (95% CI: 18.0, 20.6) in the BAVENCIO + BSC arm and 19.2 months (95% CI: 17.4, 21.6) in the BSC-alone arm3
*P-value based on stratified log-rank.
†Using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay, PD-L1-positive status was defined as PD-L1 expression in ≥25% of tumor cells or in ≥25% or 100% of tumor-associated immune cells if the percentage of immune cells was >1% or ≤1%, respectively. If none of these criteria were met, PD-L1 status was considered negative.1
CI=confidence interval; CR=complete response; NE=not estimable; PD-1=programmed death-1 receptor; PD-L1=programmed death ligand-1; PR=partial response; SD=stable disease.
Primary overall survival (OS) results—PD-L1-positive patients1†
BAVENCIO + best supportive care (BSC) demonstrated superior OS vs BSC alone in PD-L1-positive patients1
OS IN PATIENTS WITH PD-L1-POSITIVE TUMORS (N=358), DATA CUTOFF OCTOBER 21, 20191
Hazard ratio (HR): 0.56
(95% CI: 0.40, 0.79)
2-sided P-value*<0.001
Median OS: NE
(95% CI: 20.3, NE)
BAVENCIO + BSC (n=189)
VS
Median OS: 17.1 months
(95% CI: 13.5, 23.7)
BSC alone (n=169)
PD-L1-negative tumors (exploratory analysis)1
In patients with PD‑L1‑negative tumors (n=270, 39%), the OS hazard ratio was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.18)
*P-value based on stratified log-rank.
†Using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay, PD-L1-positive status was defined as PD-L1 expression in ≥25% of tumor cells or in ≥25% or 100% of tumor-associated immune cells if the percentage of immune cells was >1% or ≤1%, respectively. If none of these criteria were met, PD-L1 status was considered negative.1
CI=confidence interval; CR=complete response; NE=not estimable; PD-1=programmed death-1 receptor; PD-L1=programmed death ligand-1; PR=partial response; SD=stable disease.
LIMITATIONS: Although the follow-up overall survival (OS) analysis was prespecified, no formal hypothesis testing was performed given that the OS endpoint was met in the initial interim analysis. Therefore, no conclusions can be drawn from the follow-up OS analysis.4
4-6 cycles platinum-containing chemotherapy4; 4-10 weeks treatment-free interval4
OS was measured post-randomization (after chemotherapy and treatment-free interval)4
Median duration of follow-up was 38.0 months (95% CI: 36.1, 40.5) in the BAVENCIO + BSC arm and 39.6 months (95% CI: 36.2, 41.7) in the BSC-alone arm4,5
53% of patients in the BSC arm received another PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitor as subsequent therapy vs 11% of patients in the BAVENCIO + BSC arm4
*Using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay, PD-L1-positive status was defined as PD-L1 expression in ≥25% of tumor cells or in ≥25% or 100% of tumor-associated immune cells if the percentage of immune cells was >1% or ≤1%, respectively. If none of these criteria were met, PD-L1 status was considered negative.4
BSC=best supportive care; CI=confidence interval; PD-1=programmed death-1 receptor; PD-L1=programmed death ligand-1.
Long-term overall survival (OS) results—PD-L1-positive patients
BAVENCIO + BSC vs BSC alone in PD-L1-positive patients4*
LONG-TERM OVERALL SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH PD-L1-POSITIVE TUMORS (N=358), DATA CUTOFF JUNE 4, 20214
Hazard ratio (HR): 0.69
(95% CI: 0.52, 0.90)
Median OS: 30.9 months
(95% CI: 24.0, 39.8)
BAVENCIO + BSC (n=189)
vs
Median OS: 18.5 months
(95% CI: 14.1, 24.2)
BSC alone (n=169)
PD-L1-negative tumors (exploratory analysis)1
In patients with PD-L1-negative tumors (n=270, 39%), the OS hazard ratio was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.09)
*Using the VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay, PD-L1-positive status was defined as PD-L1 expression in ≥25% of tumor cells or in ≥25% or 100% of tumor-associated immune cells if the percentage of immune cells was >1% or ≤1%, respectively. If none of these criteria were met, PD-L1 status was considered negative.4
BSC=best supportive care; CI=confidence interval; PD-1=programmed death-1 receptor; PD-L1=programmed death ligand-1.
Limitations:
*Patients were treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy for 4 to 6 cycles.5
†The treatment-free interval was 4 to 10 weeks, per trial protocol.5
‡Stratified hazard ratio analyses are shown
BSC=best supportive care; CI=confidence interval; OS=overall survival.
Unless otherwise stated, all analyses are unstratified, and analyses in subgroups with unreported or unknown creatinine clearance or 1L chemotherapy regimen are not shown because of the small number of patients in this subgroup. OS was measured from time of randomization, after 4 to 6 cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy.
*HRs and CIs were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model.
†Stratified by best response to 1L chemotherapy (CR or PR vs SD) and metastatic disease site when initiating 1L chemotherapy (visceral vs nonvisceral).
‡Non-visceral includes patients with locally advanced disease in addition to patients with only non-visceral disease, including bone metastasis.
§Patients who switched platinum regimens while receiving 1L chemotherapy.
References: 1. Powles T, Park SH, Voog E, et al. Avelumab maintenance therapy for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(13):1218-1230. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2002788 2. Bavencio. Prescribing information. EMD Serono, Inc.; 2023. 3. Grivas P, Park SH, Voog E, et al. Avelumab first-line maintenance therapy for advanced urothelial carcinoma: comprehensive clinical subgroup analyses from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 Phase 3 Trial. Eur Urol. 2023;S0302-2838(23)02708-2. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2023.03.0302023. Online ahead of print. 4. Powles T, Park SH, Caserta C, et al. Avelumab first-line maintenance for advanced urothelial carcinoma: results from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 Trial after ≥2 years of follow-up. J Clin Oncol. 2023;JCO2201792. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.01792. Online ahead of print. 5. Data on file. EMD Serono, Inc., Rockland, MA. 6. Powles T, Park SH, Caserta C, et al. Avelumab first-line maintenance for advanced urothelial carcinoma: results from the JAVELIN Bladder 100 Trial after ≥2 years of follow-up [supplementary appendix]. J Clin Oncol. 2023;JCO2201792. doi:10.1200/JCO.22.01792. Online ahead of print. 7. Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Bladder Cancer V.3.2024. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2024. All rights reserved. Accessed April 17, 2024. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org. NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way.